Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Radiotherapy for thymic epithelial tumors: What is the optimal dose? A systematic review."
Angrisani, A; Houben, R; Marcuse, F; Hochstenbag, M; Maessen, J; De Ruysscher, D; Peeters, S.
Afiliación
  • Angrisani A; Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Houben R; Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Marcuse F; Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Hochstenbag M; Department of Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Maessen J; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • De Ruysscher D; Department of Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Peeters S; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 34: 67-74, 2022 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35360004
ABSTRACT
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare thoracic tumors, often requiring multimodal approaches. Surgery represents the first step of the treatment, possibly followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and, less frequently, chemotherapy. For unresectable tumors, a combination of chemotherapy and RT is often used. Currently, the optimal dose for patients undergoing radiation is not clearly defined. Current guidelines on RT are based on studies with a low level of evidence, where 2D RT was widely used. We aim to shed light on the optimal radiation dose for patients with TETs undergoing RT through a systematic review of the recent literature, including reports using modern RT techniques such as 3D-CRT, IMRT/VMAT, or proton-therapy. A comprehensive literature search of four databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently screened and reviewed the retrieved references. Reports with < 20 patients, 2D-RT use only, median follow-up time < 5 years, and reviews were excluded. Two studies fulfilled all the criteria and therefore were included. Loosening the follow-up time criteria to > 3 years, three additional studies could be evaluated. A total of 193 patients were analyzed, stratified for prognostic factors (histology, stage, and completeness of resection), and synthesized according to the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWIM) method. The paucity and heterogeneity of eligible studies led to controversial results. The optimal RT dose neither for postoperative, nor primary RT in the era of modern RT univocally emerged. Conversely, this overview can spark new evidence to define the optimal RT dose for each TETs category.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...