Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Actual prosthetic usage in relation to functional outcomes and wearing time in individuals with below-elbow amputation.
Salminger, Stefan; Gstoettner, Clemens; Sturma, Agnes; Mayer, Johannes A; Papst, Helmut; Aszmann, Oskar C.
Afiliación
  • Salminger S; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gstoettner C; Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sturma A; Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mayer JA; Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Papst H; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Aszmann OC; Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 46(5): 408-413, 2022 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35511449
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Wearing time of a prosthesis is regarded as an indicator for success of prosthetic rehabilitation. However, prostheses are frequently worn for esthetic purposes only. Although different supervised measurements to assess prosthetic dexterity are used, it is not clear how performance in such tests translates into actual use in everyday life.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the actual daily use of the prosthetic device in patients with below-elbow amputations by recording the number of grasping motions. STUDY

DESIGN:

Observational study.

METHODS:

Upper extremity function was evaluated using different objective and timed assessments in five unilateral patients with below-elbow amputations. In addition, patients reported daily wearing time, and the number of performed prosthetic movements over a period of at least three months was recorded.

RESULTS:

The patients achieved a mean Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure score of 66.60 ± 18.64 points. The average blocks moved in the Box and Block Test were 20.80 ± 7.46, and the mean score in the Action Research Arm Test was 37.20 ± 5.45. The mean time for the Clothespin-Relocation Test was 26.90 ± 11.61 seconds. The patients reported a wearing time of an average of 12.80 ± 3.11 hours per day. The mean number of prosthetic motions performed each day was 257.23 ± 192.95 with a range from 23.07 to 489.13.

CONCLUSIONS:

Neither high functionality nor long wearing times necessitated frequent use of a prosthesis in daily life. However, frequent daily motions did translate into good functional scores, indicating that regular device use in different real-life settings relates to functionality.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Miembros Artificiales / Codo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prosthet Orthot Int Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Miembros Artificiales / Codo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prosthet Orthot Int Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria
...