Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal complication rates associated with diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy under sedation.
Jang, Ji Min; Park, Su Bee; Yoon, Jin Young; Kwak, Min Seob; Cha, Jae Myung.
Afiliación
  • Jang JM; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park SB; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yoon JY; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kwak MS; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Cha JM; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Seoul, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(19): e29266, 2022 May 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583537
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) under sedation may result in gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI complications. However, no previous studies have reported 30-day GI and non-GI complications after diagnostic EGD under sedation.We conducted a retrospective, observational study of 30-day GI and non-GI complication rates after outpatient diagnostic EGD under sedation in subjects ≥18 years between January 2012 and December 2017 based on a common data model database. Thirty-day complication rates were compared with EGD under sedation or not, type of sedation drugs (midazolam only vs midazolam/propofol) and age groups (18-64 year vs ≥65 year) for GI (bleeding and perforation) and non-GI complications (pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and cerebral stroke).In total, 39,910 were performed with sedation (midazolam only, n = 16,033 and midazolam/propofol, n = 23,864) and 22,894 were performed without sedation. Elderly patients significantly favored EGD without sedation (P < .01). GI and non-GI complication rates were similar between EGD under sedation and without sedation (all P > .1) except for acute myocardial infarction rate, which was significantly higher in EGD without sedation than EGD under sedation (1.7/10,000 vs 0.3/10,000 persons, P = .043). All GI and non-GI complications were also similar between the midazolam/propofol and midazolam only groups as well as between young and old patients (all P > .1).Outpatient diagnostic EGD under sedation has an excellent safety profile. In addition, it can be safely performed with midazolam only or midazolam/propofol and in young and old patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article
...