Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial.
Bidard, Francois-Clement; Kaklamani, Virginia G; Neven, Patrick; Streich, Guillermo; Montero, Alberto J; Forget, Frédéric; Mouret-Reynier, Marie-Ange; Sohn, Joo Hyuk; Taylor, Donatienne; Harnden, Kathleen K; Khong, Hung; Kocsis, Judit; Dalenc, Florence; Dillon, Patrick M; Babu, Sunil; Waters, Simon; Deleu, Ines; García Sáenz, José A; Bria, Emilio; Cazzaniga, Marina; Lu, Janice; Aftimos, Philippe; Cortés, Javier; Liu, Shubin; Tonini, Giulia; Laurent, Dirk; Habboubi, Nassir; Conlan, Maureen G; Bardia, Aditya.
Afiliación
  • Bidard FC; Institut Curie, Paris and Saint Cloud, France.
  • Kaklamani VG; Versailles Saint Quentin/Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France.
  • Neven P; University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX.
  • Streich G; Universitaire Ziekenhuizen (UZ)-Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Montero AJ; Centro Médico Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Forget F; University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Mouret-Reynier MA; Centre Hospitalier de l'Ardenne-Site de Libramont, Libramont-Chevigny, Belgium.
  • Sohn JH; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Taylor D; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System-Medical Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Harnden KK; Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur-Site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.
  • Khong H; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia.
  • Kocsis J; Moffit Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
  • Dalenc F; Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház, Kecskemét, Hungary.
  • Dillon PM; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
  • Babu S; University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Waters S; Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne, IN.
  • Deleu I; Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • García Sáenz JA; AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
  • Bria E; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Cazzaniga M; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
  • Lu J; Ospedale San Gerardo-ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
  • Aftimos P; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Cortés J; Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Liu S; International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Tonini G; Scientific Department, Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Valencia, Spain.
  • Laurent D; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Habboubi N; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.
  • Conlan MG; Cytel, Waltham, MA.
  • Bardia A; Menarini Group, Florence, Italy.
J Clin Oncol ; 40(28): 3246-3256, 2022 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584336
PURPOSE: Patients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations. RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P = .0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Elacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...