Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative recovery comparisons of arthroscopic Bankart to open Latarjet for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability.
Woodmass, Jarret M; Wagner, Eric R; Smith, Jennifer; Welp, Kathryn M; Chang, Michelle J; Morissette, Marc P; Higgins, Laurence D; Warner, Jon J P.
Afiliación
  • Woodmass JM; Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Wagner ER; Pan Am Clinic, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Smith J; Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Welp KM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Chang MJ; Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Morissette MP; Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Higgins LD; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Warner JJP; Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(4): 1357-1364, 2023 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35665856
BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability is a disabling pathology that can be successfully treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet. However, there is a paucity of studies comparing the postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain and functional recovery following arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective outcomes registry database. Postoperative recovery outcomes of either a primary or revision arthroscopic Bankart and open Latarjet procedures were compared. A minimum of 1-year follow-up was required. Outcomes measures included pain visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) function score, ASES index score, and single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score. Overall, 787 patients underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart, 36 underwent revision arthroscopic Bankart and 75 underwent an open Latarjet procedure. RESULTS: When compared to primary arthroscopic Bankart, open Latarjet demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores at 6 weeks (p = 0.03), 3 months (p = 0.01), and 2 years (p < 0.05). Medium-term outcomes for ASES scores and SANE score, at 1 and 2 years showed no difference. Latarjet demonstrated significantly lower (p < 0.05) preoperative early postoperative VAS pain scores with no difference at 1 year or 2 years when compared to primary Bankart. There was no difference in ASES function or index between Bankart and Latarjet. Revision Bankart provided inferior outcomes for VAS, ASES function, and ASES index when compared to primary Bankart and Latarjet at 1 year and 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet provided nearly equivalent improvements in pain (VAS) and functional outcomes (ASES, SANE, VR-12) during the early recovery phase (2 years). This study supports the use of either procedure in the primary treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability. Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair demonstrated deteriorating outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Luxación del Hombro / Articulación del Hombro / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Luxación del Hombro / Articulación del Hombro / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...