Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges in virtual collection of patient-reported data: a prospective cohort study conducted in COVID-19 era.
Kazazian, Karineh; Bogach, Jessica; Johnston, Wendy; Ng, Deanna; Swallow, Carol J.
Afiliación
  • Kazazian K; Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bogach J; Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.
  • Johnston W; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Ng D; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.
  • Swallow CJ; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(9): 7535-7544, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670865
ABSTRACT
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients attending ambulatory clinics at cancer centers in Ontario completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at each visit. At our center, completion was via touchpad, with assistance from clinic volunteers. As of March 2020, clinic appointments were conducted virtually when possible and touch pads removed. We anticipated a negative impact on the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the recognition of severe symptoms.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective cross-sectional cohort study to investigate remote ESAS completion by patients with appointments at a weekly surgical oncology clinic. Patients in the initial study cohort were asked to complete and return the ESAS virtually (V). Given low completion rates, the ensuing cohort was asked to complete a hard-copy (HC) ESAS. For the final cohort, we provided remote, personal mentorship by a member of the care team to support virtual electronic ESAS completion (virtual-mentored (VM) cohort).

RESULTS:

Between May and July 2020, a total of 174 patient encounters were included in the study. For the V cohort, 20/46 patients (44%) successfully completed and returned the electronic ESAS, compared to 49/50 (98%) for the HC cohort. For the VM cohort, the overall completion rate was 74% (58/78); however, 12 of these 58 patients did not independently complete a virtual ESAS. Virtual questionnaire completion was not predicted by age, sex, or tumor site, although patients who completed the ESAS were more likely to be in active management rather than surveillance (p = 0.04). Of all completed forms, 42% revealed a depression score of ≥2, and 27% an anxiety score of ≥4.

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified significant barriers to the virtual completion of ESAS forms, with a lack of predictive variables. The severe degree of psychological distress reported by ~50% of respondents demonstrates the need for ongoing regular collection/review of these data. Innovative solutions are required to overcome barriers to the virtual collection of PROs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...