Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Schoberer, Daniela; Osmancevic, Selvedina; Reiter, Lea; Thonhofer, Nina; Hoedl, Manuela.
Afiliación
  • Schoberer D; Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz4/3, 8010, Graz, Austria.
  • Osmancevic S; Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz4/3, 8010, Graz, Austria.
  • Reiter L; Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz4/3, 8010, Graz, Austria.
  • Thonhofer N; Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz4/3, 8010, Graz, Austria.
  • Hoedl M; Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz4/3, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Public Health Pract (Oxf) ; 4: 100280, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35722539
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide have and are using personal protective equipment (PPE) as COVID-19 prevention measures, including gloves, gowns, goggles, masks and hand hygiene. Although several reviews have been published on the effectiveness of PPE, these often include studies on other inflectional diseases. This is problematic, because these diseases differ with regard to, e.g. the transmissibility and viral loads in the days after infection. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness of PPE to protect HCWs from COVID-19 infections.

Design:

Rapid review of literature.

Methods:

We followed a practical guide to conduct the rapid review based on a protocol established by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Meta-analyses have been conducted to synthesize the results. The confidence in the evidence was determined using the GRADE method.

Results:

We found 461 reviews and 208 primary studies, of which 16 systematic reviews included 11 observational studies of interest. Wearing PPE conferred significant protection against infection with COVID-19 as opposed to not wearing adequate PPE. Overall, the review results show that wearing face masks can significantly protect HCWs from infection. We found no effects for wearing gloves and gowns. Practicing thorough hand hygiene and having proper PPE, as compared to lacking proper PPE, showed a protective but not statistically significant effect. No studies reported the side effects of wearing PPE or acceptance rates.

Conclusion:

This evidence supports PPE use by HCW, and especially N95 masks, to reduce the risk of a COVID-19 infection.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Pract (Oxf) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Pract (Oxf) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria
...