Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).
Buijs, George S; de Gendt, Erin E A; Sadiqi, Said; Post, Marcel W; Muijs, Sander P J; Oner, F Cumhur.
Afiliación
  • Buijs GS; Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • de Gendt EEA; Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Sadiqi S; Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Post MW; Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center and Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Muijs SPJ; Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Oner FC; Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 47(17): E562-E569, 2022 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35853155
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate the AO Spine Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (PROST) at a minimum of 12 months posttrauma and to evaluate patient characteristics, types of spine fractures, and treatment strategies as determinants of AO Spine PROST scores. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reliability and validity of the AO Spine PROST as a measure of health-related quality of life for more than 12 months after onset of spine trauma is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a traumatic spine injury were recruited from a level-1 trauma center. They were asked to complete the AO Spine PROST, EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), and either Oswestry disability index (ODI) or neck disability index (NDI) for concurrent validity. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating the Cronbach α and item-total correlation coefficients. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Spearman correlation tests were performed for the AO Spine PROST in correlation with the EQ-5D-5L, and either ODI or NDI. Determinants for AO Spine PROST score were analyzed using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients participated in the cross-sectional arm and 49 in the test-retest arm of the study. Median duration of follow-up was 94.5 months. No floor or ceiling effects were seen. Internal consistency was excellent (α=0.98, item-total correlation coefficient: 0.73-0.91) as well as test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.81). Satisfactory correlations were seen for the EQ-5D-5L (0.76; P <0.001), ODI (0.69; P <0.001), and NDI (0.68; P <0.001) with the AO Spine PROST. Multivariate linear regression models showed that having ≥1 comorbidities, duration of return to work within the range of 7 to 43 months and no return to work were significant independent determinants for a worse AO Spine PROST score. CONCLUSIONS: Very good long-term reliability and validity results were found for the AO Spine PROST.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Traumatismos Vertebrales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Traumatismos Vertebrales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...