Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstetrical Outcomes After Implementation of Laborist Model During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Prasannan, Lakha; Gerber, Rachel; Gulersen, Moti; Shan, Weiwei; Blitz, Matthew J; Rochelson, Burton.
Afiliación
  • Prasannan L; From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital- Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola.
  • Gerber R; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead.
  • Gulersen M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
  • Blitz MJ; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
  • Rochelson B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
J Patient Saf ; 18(8): e1243-e1246, 2022 12 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858475
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted labor and delivery units to establish ways to decrease viral exposure to healthcare workers while continuing to deliver optimal patient care. A laborist model was implemented to improve safety at our tertiary care hospital in Long Island. The aim of the study is to determine whether implementation of a laborist model during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a change in the frequency of cesarean birth. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included patients who delivered at a single tertiary center during March 2019 to May 2019 and March 2020 to May 2020 when our laborist model was initiated. The primary outcome compared the frequency of a cesarean delivery between both models. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of adverse obstetrical complications, which included intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, intra-amniotic infection, hemorrhage, and need for blood transfusion. Statistical analysis included multivariable regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1506 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in the frequency of cesarean births between both models (37% versus 35%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-2.89). Similarly, there were no significant differences in adverse outcomes between the study populations (adjusted odds ratio, 1.064; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.59). CONCLUSIONS: A change in practice behavior during a pandemic was not associated with an increase in frequency of cesarean births or adverse obstetrical outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 4_TD Problema de salud: 4_pneumonia Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Obstetricia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 4_TD Problema de salud: 4_pneumonia Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Obstetricia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article
...