Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for additional magnetic resonance imaging in abdominal computed tomography.
Kuo, Yu; Lee, Kang-Lung; Chen, Yi-Lun; Weng, Ching-Yao; Chang, Feng-Chi; Chen, Tzeng-Ji; Wu, Hsiu-Mei; Wu, Chia-Hung.
Afiliación
  • Kuo Y; Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Lee KL; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei,Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chen YL; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Weng CY; Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chang FC; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chen TJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei,Taiwan, ROC.
  • Wu HM; Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Wu CH; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 86(2): 240-245, 2023 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36346207
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Reporting the findings from radiologic images is an important method for radiologists to communicate with referring physicians. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) after abdominal computed tomography (CT) studies for abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

METHODS:

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which includes data collected from the radiology information system (RIS) database of a tertiary medical referral center. Associations between abdominal CT and subsequent abdominal MR were recorded. The effectiveness of RAIs in an abdominal report was determined. The influence of the wording and the location of the RAIs were also analyzed.

RESULTS:

The presence of RAIs in an abdominal CT report for an abdominal MR examination was more likely to result in a subsequent MR examination within 120 days (36.7% vs. 4.0%). RAIs were also associated with a reduction in the time interval between the CT and MR examinations (29.0 days vs. 39.0 days). The most effective recommendations included wording that advocated for further evaluation and were mentioned in both the context and conclusion of the report.

CONCLUSION:

RAIs have a significant influence on clinical decisions. Radiologists should be aware of the power of RAIs and be prudent and conscientious when making recommendations in radiology reports.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chin Med Assoc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chin Med Assoc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...