Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.
Salsone, Maria; Quattrone, Andrea; Vescio, Basilio; Ferini-Strambi, Luigi; Quattrone, Aldo.
Afiliación
  • Salsone M; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, 20054 Segrate, Italy.
  • Quattrone A; Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20127 Milan, Italy.
  • Vescio B; Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Ferini-Strambi L; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Quattrone A; Biotecnomed S.C.aR.L., c/o Magna Graecia University, G Building, lev.1, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(11)2022 Nov 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36359532
ABSTRACT
Background and

purpose:

Growing evidence suggests that Machine Learning (ML) models can assist the diagnosis of neurological disorders. However, little is known about the potential application of ML in diagnosing idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), a parasomnia characterized by a high risk of phenoconversion to synucleinopathies. This study aimed to develop a model using ML algorithms to identify iRBD patients and test its accuracy.

Methods:

Data were acquired from 32 participants (20 iRBD patients and 12 controls). All subjects underwent a video-polysomnography. In all subjects, we measured the components of heart rate variability (HRV) during 24 h recordings and calculated night-to-day ratios (cardiac autonomic indices). Discriminating performances of single HRV features were assessed. ML models based on Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were trained on HRV data. The utility of HRV features and ML models for detecting iRBD was evaluated by area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy corresponding to optimal models.

Results:

Cardiac autonomic indices had low performances (accuracy 63-69%) in distinguishing iRBD from control subjects. By contrast, the RF model performed the best, with excellent accuracy (94%), sensitivity (95%) and specificity (92%), while XGBoost showed accuracy (91%), specificity (83%) and sensitivity (95%). The mean triangular index during wake (TIw) was the best discriminating feature between iRBD and HC, with 81% accuracy, reaching 84% accuracy when combined with VLF power during sleep using an LR model.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrated that ML algorithms can accurately identify iRBD patients. Our model could be used in clinical practice to facilitate the early detection of this form of RBD.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...