Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal.
Hernández-Moreno, Laura; Senra, Hugo; Marques, Ana Patricia; Perdomo, Natacha Moreno; Macedo, Antonio Filipe.
Afiliación
  • Hernández-Moreno L; Department and Center of Physics-Optometry and Vision Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
  • Senra H; Centre for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioural Intervention (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Marques AP; School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
  • Perdomo NM; International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Macedo AF; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 12(1): 307-323, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369618
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this study was twofold (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal.

METHODS:

The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4-1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, health-related quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms.

RESULTS:

Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p < 0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D-5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity.

CONCLUSION:

The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered, 21/01/2019. ISRCTN10894889, https//www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10894889.
There is limited research addressing the actual impact of vision rehabilitation. The current trial compares the effect of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention with usual care on patients' functioning. The intervention was clinically impactful and cost-effective.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal
...