Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Associated With Cosmetic Outcomes After Treatment With a Novel Form of Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy.
Squeo, Gabriella C; Meneveau, Max O; Varhegyi, Nikole E; Lattimore, Courtney M; Janowski, Einsley; Showalter, Timothy N; Showalter, Shayna L.
Afiliación
  • Squeo GC; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Meneveau MO; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Varhegyi NE; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Lattimore CM; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Janowski E; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Showalter TN; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Showalter SL; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: snl2t@virginia.edu.
J Surg Res ; 283: 514-522, 2023 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436288
INTRODUCTION: Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) incorporates computed tomography-guided treatment planning and high dose rate brachytherapy to deliver a single dose of highly conformal radiational therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with poor cosmetic outcomes after treatment with PB-IORT. METHODS: The study included all consecutive participants enrolled in an ongoing phase II clinical trial that had completed a minimum of 12 mo of follow-up. A poor cosmetic outcome was defined as scoring "fair" or "poor" on the Harvard Cosmesis evaluation, or "some" or "very much" on any of the three general cosmesis categories. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing R. RESULTS: The final cohort included 201 participants, of which 181 (90%) had an overall good/excellent cosmetic outcome. Group 1 consisted of 162 (81%) participants who reported only excellent/good cosmetic outcomes. Group 2 consisted of 39 (19%) participants who reported some aspect of a poor cosmetic outcome. On multivariable analysis, participants with ductal carcinoma in situ were significantly more likely to experience a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.82, P = 0.04), and those who received subsequent whole breast irradiation were also more likely to have a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 10.20, 95% confidence interval CI 1.04-99.95, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with need for further radiation after PB-IORT are at increased risk for a poor cosmetic outcome. Larger balloon volume and distance between the skin do not have deleterious effects on cosmetic outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias de la Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias de la Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...