Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy.
Wong, Daniel G; Monda, Steve; Vetter, Joel; Lai, Henry; Olsen, Margaret A; Keller, Matthew; Desai, Alana.
Afiliación
  • Wong DG; Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: d.g.wong@wustl.edu.
  • Monda S; Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
  • Vetter J; Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
  • Lai H; Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
  • Olsen MA; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
  • Keller M; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
  • Desai A; Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Urology ; 174: 42-47, 2023 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574909
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine risk factors and time course for repeat procedures after ureteroscopy (URS) or shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) procedure using a large employer-based claims database.

METHODS:

We identified all patients who underwent treatment for ureteral or renal stone with URS or SWL from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014 using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Repeat stone procedure was evaluated after a 90-day grace period from the index procedure. Patients were followed until December 31, 2017. We performed multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards to determine independent risk factors for repeat procedure after the initial stone removal.

RESULTS:

A total of 189,739 patients underwent a SWL or URS and were included in the study. The incidence of repeat procedure per 100 person years was 6.8, and 4.4 after SWL and URS, respectively. The median time to reoperation was 12.5 months for SWL and 14.6 months for URS. On multivariable analysis, SWL was associated with an increased risk of repeat procedure compared to URS. (HR = 1.63). Paralysis, neurogenic bladder and inflammatory bowel disease were also associated with an increased risk of repeat procedure (HR = 1.66, 1.40, and 1.36 respectively)

CONCLUSION:

In a large national cohort, patients with paralysis and neurogenic bladder had a significantly higher risk of repeat stone procedure. SWL was associated with higher risk of repeat procedure than URS. Urologists can use these data to identify and counsel patients at high risk for need for recurrent procedure.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...