Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does usage of monetary incentive impact the involvement in surveys? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 randomized controlled trials.
Abdelazeem, Basel; Hamdallah, Aboalmagd; Rizk, Marwa Abdelazim; Abbas, Kirellos Said; El-Shahat, Nahla Ahmed; Manasrah, Nouraldeen; Mostafa, Mostafa Reda; Eltobgy, Mostafa.
Afiliación
  • Abdelazeem B; McLaren Health Care, Flint, Michigan, United States of America.
  • Hamdallah A; Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
  • Rizk MA; Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.
  • Abbas KS; Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
  • El-Shahat NA; Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Manasrah N; Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azher University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Mostafa MR; Detroit Medical Center/Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Eltobgy M; Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0279128, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36649255
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surveys are an effective method for collecting a large quantity of data. However, incomplete responses to these surveys can affect the validity of the studies and introduce bias. Recent studies have suggested that monetary incentives may increase survey response rates. We intended to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of monetary incentives on survey participation.

METHODS:

A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to collect studies assessing the impact of monetary incentives on survey participation. The primary outcome of interest was the response rates to incentives money, lottery, and voucher. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. We calculated the rate ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Review Manager Software (version 5.3). We used random-effects analysis and considered the data statistically significant with a P-value <0.05.

RESULTS:

Forty-six RCTs were included. A total of 109,648 participants from 14 countries were involved. The mean age of participants ranged from 15 to more than 60 years, with 27.5% being males, 16.7% being females, and the other 55.8% not reported. Our analysis showed a significant increase in response rate in the incentive group compared to the control group, irrespective of the incentive methods. Money was the most efficient way to increase the response rate (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.16,1.35; P = < 0.00001) compared to voucher (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.08,1.31; P = < 0.0005) and lottery (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.03,1.22; P = < 0.009).

CONCLUSION:

Monetary incentives encourage the response rate in surveys. Money was more effective than vouchers or lotteries. Therefore, researchers may include money as an incentive to improve the response rate while conducting surveys.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigadores / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigadores / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...