Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antibody titer levels and the effect on subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large US-based cohort.
Sullivan, Adam; Alfego, David; Hu, Pingsha; Gillim, Laura; Grover, Ajay; Garcia, Chris; Cohen, Oren; Letovsky, Stan.
Afiliación
  • Sullivan A; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Alfego D; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Hu P; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Gillim L; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Grover A; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Garcia C; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Cohen O; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
  • Letovsky S; LabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Heliyon ; 9(2): e13103, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36712916
ABSTRACT
Despite a growing amount of data around the kinetics and durability of the antibody response induced by vaccination and previous infection, there is little understanding of whether or not a given quantitative level of antibodies correlates to protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or reinfection. In this study, we examine SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody titers and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests in a large cohort of US-based patients. We analyzed antibody test results in a cohort of 22,204 individuals, 6.8% (n = 1,509) of whom eventually tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, suggesting infection or reinfection. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to understand the effect of various levels of anti-spike RBD antibody titers (classified into discrete ranges) on subsequent RT-PCR positivity rates. Statistical analyses included fitting a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the age-, sex- and exposure-adjusted hazard ratios for S antibody titer, using zip-code positivity rates by week as a proxy for COVID-19 exposure. It was found that the best models of the temporally associated infection risk were those based on log antibody titer level (HR = 0.836 (p < 0.05)). When titers were binned, the hazard ratio associated with antibody titer >250 Binding Antibody Units (BAU) was 0.27 (p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.18, 0.41]), while the hazard ratio associated with previous infection was 0.20 (p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.10, 0.39]). Fisher exact odds ratio (OR) for Ab titers <250 BAU showed OR = 2.84 (p < 0.05; 95% CI [2.30, 3.53]) for predicting the outcome of a subsequent PCR test. Antibody titer levels correlate with protection against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection or reinfection when examining a cohort of real-world patients who had the spike RBD antibody assay performed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...