Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection of Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions Using a Full Thickness Resection Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bomman, Shivanand; Klair, Jagpal S; Canakis, Andrew; Muthusamy, Arun Kumar; Nagra, Navroop; Chandra, Shruti; Shanmugam, Meena; Perisetti, Abhilash; Aggarwal, Avin; Gavini, Hemanth K; Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh.
Afiliación
  • Bomman S; Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health.
  • Klair JS; Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health.
  • Canakis A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Muthusamy AK; Department of Gastroenterology, Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, Waterloo, IA.
  • Nagra N; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY.
  • Chandra S; Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Shanmugam M; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
  • Perisetti A; Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN.
  • Aggarwal A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
  • Gavini HK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
  • Krishnamoorthi R; Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 58(1): 46-52, 2024 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730483
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a promising technique that allows for a minimally invasive resection of mucosal and submucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The data regarding the efficacy and safety of performing EFTR of upper GI lesions using a full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is limited. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that evaluated this technique.

METHODS:

We performed a comprehensive systematic search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings that reported outcomes of EFTR using the FTRD system. The weighted pooled rates of technical success, complete (R0) resection, adverse events (AE), and residual or recurrent lesions were analyzed with 95% CI using the random effects model.

RESULTS:

Eight studies with a total of 139 patients who underwent EFTR of upper GI lesions were included in the study. The pooled, weighted rate of technical success was 88.2% (95% CI 81.4-92.7%, I2 0). The R0 resection rate was 70.7% (95% CI 62.5-77.8%, I2 0). Overall AE rates were 22.1% (95% CI 15.8-30.1%, I2 0), however, most of the AEs were minor. Of the patients who had follow-up endoscopies, the residual and/or recurrent lesion rate was 6.1% (95% CI 2.4-14.4%, I2 0). Heterogeneity in the analysis was low.

CONCLUSIONS:

EFTR using the FTRD seems to be effective and safe with acceptable R0 resection rates and low recurrence rates. Further prospective studies are required to validate our results and to compare various modalities of endoscopic resection with this single-step EFTR device.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Adenoma / Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Adenoma / Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...