Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hospital readmissions in children with new-onset infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.
Harini, Chellamani; Yuskaitis, Christopher J; Singh, Avantika; McHugh, Trevor; Liu, Shanshan; DeLeo, Michelle; Gupta, Nishtha; Marti, Candice; Zhang, Bo; Libenson, Mark H; Berry, Jay G.
Afiliación
  • Harini C; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Yuskaitis CJ; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Singh A; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • McHugh T; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Liu S; Biostatistics and Research Design Center, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • DeLeo M; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gupta N; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Marti C; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Zhang B; Biostatistics and Research Design Center, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Libenson MH; Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Berry JG; Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Epilepsia Open ; 8(2): 444-455, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36790214
OBJECTIVE: To describe inpatient resource use in the 2 years following infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) diagnosis, examine the association between clinical/demographic variables and incidence of readmission, and identify risk factors/reasons for frequent readmissions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of readmissions (scheduled/unscheduled) within the first 2 years following IESS diagnosis, details of readmissions (number/time between rehospitalizations, and length of stay), demographic/clinical variables, and reasons for readmissions were collected. Negative binomial regression analysis evaluated associations between incidence of readmissions (both scheduled/unscheduled and unscheduled alone) and demographic/clinical factors. Logistic regression assessed the risk of having recurrent readmissions (≥5 readmissions). RESULTS: Among 93 (60% males) new-onset IESS patients, there were 394 readmissions (56% scheduled and 44% unscheduled) within 2-years following IESS diagnosis. Mean length of stay was 3.5 days (SD: 5.9). Readmissions occurred in 82 patients (88%) and 37 (40%) experienced ≥5 readmissions. On multivariate regression analysis, readmissions were increased with use of multiple first-line treatments for IESS (P = 0.006), technology assistance (P ≤ 0.001), and multispecialty care (P = 0.01); seizure freedom (P = 0.015) and known etiology (P = 0.011) lowered the incidence of readmissions. Examining unscheduled readmissions separately, increased readmissions occurred with public insurance (P = 0.013), technology use (P ≤ 0.0.001), and multispecialty care (P = 0.013); seizure freedom decreased unscheduled readmissions (P = 0.006). Technology assistance (G-tube, NG tube, VP shunt, and tracheostomy use) increased the odds (P = 0.007) for recurrent readmissions. Reasons for readmissions included EEG monitoring (protocol driven for verification of IESS remission/characterization of events/EEG surveillance/presurgical monitoring) (51%), acute medical issues (21%), and seizure exacerbation (15%). Protocol-driven readmissions declined an estimated 52% following protocol modification during the study. SIGNIFICANCE: In the 2 years following IESS diagnosis, there is substantial inpatient resource use with nearly 40% experiencing ≥5 readmissions (mostly epilepsy related). Since readmissions are increased by intrinsic patient characteristics such as medical complexity (technology use and multispecialty care) or epilepsy-related issues, the preventability of readmissions is uncertain, except for protocol-driven ones.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Readmisión del Paciente / Epilepsia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Readmisión del Paciente / Epilepsia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...