Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcome of Bioball universal adapter in revision hip arthroplasty.
Garabadi, Mohanrao; Akhtar, Meraj; Blow, Jody; Pawar, Rajesh; Rowsell, Mark; Antapur, Prasad.
Afiliación
  • Garabadi M; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
  • Akhtar M; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
  • Blow J; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
  • Pawar R; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
  • Rowsell M; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
  • Antapur P; Trauma & Orthopaedics, United Kingdom.
J Orthop ; 38: 68-72, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008449
Background: Removal of a well-fixed uncemented femoral component in revision hip arthroplasty is challenging. A modular head-neck adapter provides an option to optimise the femoral offset and anteversion, avoiding the need for femoral stem revision. Aim: To present the clinical results following revision arthroplasty with the Bioball head-neck adapter in the elderly American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade II, III & IV patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of our database was performed, and all patients classed as ASA grades II, III, & IV treated with the Bioball Universal Adapter (BUA) for 10 years were included. The indication for revision, stem retention, type of adapter, and head size were identified. Patients were contacted by a research nurse to assess the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and any symptoms of instability at a minimum of one year post revision surgery. Results: Our study included 47 patients. 5 (10.6%) were ASA II, 19 (40.4%) were ASA III and 23 (49%) were ASA IV. The mean age was 74 years. The mean follow up was 52 months ± 28.4 SD. The median FJS was 86 ± 11.6 SD. The median OHS was 43 ± 6.2 SD. One patient (2.1%) developed recurrent dislocation following lumbar spinal fusion. None of the other patients experienced instability. The survival rate for the adapter was 98%. Conclusion: The BUA gives good clinical outcomes with very low post revision instability. It is a valuable option for the elderly because it avoids the morbidity and risks associated with the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...