Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal Timing of Targeted Temperature Management for Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: Is Sooner Better?
Wang, I-Ting; Wang, Chieh-Jen; Chen, Chao-Hsien; Yang, Sheng-Hsiung; Chen, Chun-Yen; Huang, Yen-Chun; Lin, Chang-Yi; Wu, Chien-Liang.
Afiliación
  • Wang IT; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
  • Wang CJ; Department of Critical Care Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
  • Chen CH; Department of Medicine, MacKay Memorial College, New Taipei City 25245, Taiwan.
  • Yang SH; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
  • Chen CY; Department of Medicine, MacKay Memorial College, New Taipei City 25245, Taiwan.
  • Huang YC; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
  • Lin CY; Department of Medicine, MacKay Memorial College, New Taipei City 25245, Taiwan.
  • Wu CL; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
J Clin Med ; 12(7)2023 Mar 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37048710
Targeted temperature management (TTM) is often considered to improve post-cardiac arrest patients' outcomes. However, the optimal timing to initiate cooling remained uncertain. This retrospective analysis enrolled all non-traumatic post-cardiac arrest adult patients with either out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who received TTM from July 2015 to July 2021 at our hospital. The values of time delay before TTM and time to target temperature were divided into three periods according to optimal cut-off values identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A total of 177 patients were enrolled. A shorter time delay before TTM (pre-induction time) was associated with a lower survival chance at 28 days (32.00% vs. 54.00%, p = 0.0279). Patients with a longer cooling induction time (>440 minis) had better neurological outcomes (1.58% vs. 1.05%; p = 0.001) and survival at 28 days (58.06% vs. 29.25%; p = 0.006). After COX regression analysis, the influence of pre-induction time on survival became insignificant, but patients who cooled slowest still had a better chance of survival at 28 days. In conclusion, a shorter delay before TTM was not associated with better clinical outcomes. However, patients who took longer to reach the target temperature had better hospital survival and neurological outcomes than those who were cooled more rapidly. A further prospective study was warranted to evaluate the appropriate time window of TTM.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán
...