Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting During Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers: First Results.
Hopman, Luuk H G A; Hillier, Elizabeth; Liu, Yuchi; Hamilton, Jesse; Fischer, Kady; Seiberlich, Nicole; Friedrich, Matthias G.
Afiliación
  • Hopman LHGA; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Hillier E; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Liu Y; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Hamilton J; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Fischer K; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Seiberlich N; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Friedrich MG; Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 31(2): 71-82, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37096671
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) enables simultaneous mapping of myocardial T1 and T2 with very short acquisition times. Breathing maneuvers have been utilized as a vasoactive stress test to dynamically characterize myocardial tissue in vivo. We tested the feasibility of sequential, rapid cMRF acquisitions during breathing maneuvers to quantify myocardial T1 and T2 changes. METHODS: We measured T1 and T2 values using conventional T1 and T2-mapping techniques (modified look locker inversion [MOLLI] and T2-prepared balanced-steady state free precession), and a 15 heartbeat (15-hb) and rapid 5-hb cMRF sequence in a phantom and in 9 healthy volunteers. The cMRF5-hb sequence was also used to dynamically assess T1 and T2 changes over the course of a vasoactive combined breathing maneuver. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, the mean myocardial T1 of the different mapping methodologies were: MOLLI 1,224 ± 81 ms, cMRF15-hb 1,359 ± 97 ms, and cMRF5-hb 1,357 ± 76 ms. The mean myocardial T2 measured with the conventional mapping technique was 41.7 ± 6.7 ms, while for cMRF15-hb 29.6 ± 5.8 ms and cMRF5-hb 30.5 ± 5.8 ms. T2 was reduced with vasoconstriction (post-hyperventilation compared to a baseline resting state) (30.15 ± 1.53 ms vs. 27.99 ± 2.07 ms, p = 0.02), while T1 did not change with hyperventilation. During the vasodilatory breath-hold, no significant change of myocardial T1 and T2 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: cMRF5-hb enables simultaneous mapping of myocardial T1 and T2, and may be used to track dynamic changes of myocardial T1 and T2 during vasoactive combined breathing maneuvers.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...