Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15.
Das, Rhiju; Kretsch, Rachael C; Simpkin, Adam J; Mulvaney, Thomas; Pham, Phillip; Rangan, Ramya; Bu, Fan; Keegan, Ronan M; Topf, Maya; Rigden, Daniel J; Miao, Zhichao; Westhof, Eric.
Afiliación
  • Das R; Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA USA.
  • Kretsch RC; Biophysics Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA USA.
  • Simpkin AJ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, CA USA.
  • Mulvaney T; Biophysics Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA USA.
  • Pham P; Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, UK.
  • Rangan R; Centre for Structural Systems Biology (CSSB), Leibniz-Institut für Virologie (LIV).
  • Bu F; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
  • Keegan RM; Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA USA.
  • Topf M; Biophysics Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA USA.
  • Rigden DJ; Guangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou 510005, China.
  • Miao Z; Division of Life Sciences and Medicine,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China.
  • Westhof E; Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, UK.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Oct 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37162955
ABSTRACT
The prediction of RNA three-dimensional structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we report assessments of RNA structure predictions in CASP15, the first CASP exercise that involved RNA structure modeling. Forty two predictor groups submitted models for at least one of twelve RNA-containing targets. These models were evaluated by the RNA-Puzzles organizers and, separately, by a CASP-recruited team using metrics (GDT, lDDT) and approaches (Z-score rankings) initially developed for assessment of proteins and generalized here for RNA assessment. The two assessments independently ranked the same predictor groups as first (AIchemy_RNA2), second (Chen), and third (RNAPolis and GeneSilico, tied); predictions from deep learning approaches were significantly worse than these top ranked groups, which did not use deep learning. Further analyses based on direct comparison of predicted models to cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps and X-ray diffraction data support these rankings. With the exception of two RNA-protein complexes, models submitted by CASP15 groups correctly predicted the global fold of the RNA targets. Comparisons of CASP15 submissions to designed RNA nanostructures as well as molecular replacement trials highlight the potential utility of current RNA modeling approaches for RNA nanotechnology and structural biology, respectively. Nevertheless, challenges remain in modeling fine details such as non-canonical pairs, in ranking among submitted models, and in prediction of multiple structures resolved by cryo-EM or crystallography.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...