Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sugibayashi, Takahiro; Walston, Shannon L; Matsumoto, Toshimasa; Mitsuyama, Yasuhito; Miki, Yukio; Ueda, Daiju.
Afiliación
  • Sugibayashi T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Walston SL; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Matsumoto T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Mitsuyama Y; Smart Life Science Lab, Center for Health Science Innovation, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Miki Y; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ueda D; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Eur Respir Rev ; 32(168)2023 Jun 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286217
BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that applied DL for pneumothorax diagnosis using imaging. Meta-analysis via a hierarchical model to calculate the summary area under the curve (AUC) and pooled sensitivity and specificity for both DL and physicians was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In 56 of the 63 primary studies, pneumothorax was identified from chest radiography. The total AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) for both DL and physicians. The total pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 79-89%) for DL and 85% (95% CI 73-92%) for physicians and the pooled specificity was 96% (95% CI 94-98%) for DL and 98% (95% CI 95-99%) for physicians. More than half of the original studies (57%) had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found the diagnostic performance of DL models was similar to that of physicians, although the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Further pneumothorax AI research is needed.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumotórax / Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir Rev Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumotórax / Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir Rev Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón
...