Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of mini-implant insertion between mesial and distal buccal roots of a maxillary first molar: A cone-beam computed tomography imaging study.
Liu, Ji-Nan; He, Yin-Xue; Jia, Xue-Ting; Huang, Rui; Zeng, Na; Fan, Xiao-Chuan; Huang, Xiao-Feng.
Afiliación
  • Liu JN; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • He YX; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Jia XT; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Huang R; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Zeng N; National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China; School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Fan XC; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Huang XF; Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: huangxf1998@163.com.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 164(5): 665-673, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37318427
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Mini-implant insertion in the maxillary posterior region can be influenced by anatomic limitations, thus increasing the failure rate. We explored the feasibility of a new implantation site the region between the mesial and distal buccal roots of the maxillary first molar.

METHODS:

Cone-beam computed tomography data from 177 patients were collected from a database. The maxillary first molars were morphologically classified by analyzing the angle and morphology of the mesial and distal buccal roots. Next, 77 subjects were randomly selected from the 177 patients to measure and analyze the hard-tissue morphology in the maxillary posterior region.

RESULTS:

We devised the Morphological Classification on the Mesial and Distal Buccal Roots of Maxillary First Molar (MCBRMM), divided into 3 types MCBRMM-I, II, and III. In all subjects, MCBRMM-I, II, and III accounted for 43%, 25%, and 32%, respectively. At 8 mm from the mesial cementoenamel junction of maxillary first molars, the interradicular distance between the maxillary first molar's mesiodistal buccal roots of MCBRMM-I was 2.6 mm, showing an upward trend from the cementoenamel junction to the apex. The distance from the buccal bone cortex to the palatal root was >9 mm. The buccal cortical thickness was >1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provided a potential site for mini-implant insertion in the maxillary posterior region the alveolar bone of maxillary first molars in MCBRMM-I.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...