Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301.
Cho, Byoung Chul; Ahn, Myung-Ju; Kang, Jin Hyoung; Soo, Ross A; Reungwetwattana, Thanyanan; Yang, James Chih-Hsin; Cicin, Irfan; Kim, Dong-Wan; Wu, Yi-Long; Lu, Shun; Lee, Ki Hyeong; Pang, Yong-Kek; Zimina, Anastasia; Fong, Chin Heng; Poddubskaya, Elena; Sezer, Ahmet; How, Soon Hin; Danchaivijitr, Pongwut; Kim, YuKyung; Lim, Yeji; An, Taewon; Lee, Hana; Byun, Hae Mi; Zaric, Bojan.
Afiliación
  • Cho BC; Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ahn MJ; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang JH; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Soo RA; National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Reungwetwattana T; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Yang JC; National Taiwan University Cancer Center and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Cicin I; Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University Medical Center, Edirne, Turkey.
  • Kim DW; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Wu YL; Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lu S; Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Lee KH; Internal Medicine Department, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Pang YK; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Zimina A; Department of Oncology, Omsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russian Federation.
  • Fong CH; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Hospital Pulau Pinang, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Poddubskaya E; Personalized Oncology Department, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Sezer A; Adana Baskent Practice and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
  • How SH; Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
  • Danchaivijitr P; Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kim Y; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim Y; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • An T; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee H; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Byun HM; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Zaric B; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(26): 4208-4217, 2023 09 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379502
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 11 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS:

Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles.

CONCLUSION:

Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...