Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical use of photobiomodulation for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis: the real-life experience of MASCC/ISOO members.
Abdalla-Aslan, Ragda; Zadik, Yehuda; Intrator, Orna; Bardellini, Elena; Cheng, Karis Kin Fong; Bossi, Paolo; Yarom, Noam; Elad, Sharon.
Afiliación
  • Abdalla-Aslan R; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
  • Zadik Y; Department of Oral Medicine, Sedation and Imaging, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Intrator O; Department of Oral Medicine, Sedation and Imaging, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Bardellini E; Department of Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Cheng KKF; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Bossi P; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialities, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, School of Dentistry, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Yarom N; Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Japan.
  • Elad S; Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST-Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(8): 481, 2023 Jul 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479822
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To assess clinical use and patient outcome of photobiomodulation (PBM) for oral mucositis (OM) prevention and treatment among specialized practitioners.

METHODS:

A poll was emailed to the members of the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The PBM parameters used by the respondents were analyzed using exploratory statistical methods to identify combinations of PBM parameters (patterns) that characterize the variance in the protocols (principal component analysis).

RESULTS:

Responses were received from 101 MSG members, with 78 providing analyzable data. Most of the responders were dental practitioners or oral medicine specialists. PBM was used by 59% of the responders for OM or targeted therapy stomatitis. Technical parameters varied widely. Most responders used wavelengths ∼650 nm intra-orally. The spot-size and distance from the tissue were the main factors driving the variation. All PBM users noted that PBM relieved pain, either immediately or a delayed effect. High likelihood of pain relief (measured as responder's report of pain relief in 67-100% of patients) was reported by 22% and 19% of PBM users for immediate pain relief and delayed pain relief, respectively. The most common reported barriers to using PBM were financial considerations, time constraints, lack of training or experience and concern about the potential for malignant transformation or increased risk of cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of PBM for OM prevention or treatment is in early phases of adoption in practices, facing some obstacles to implement it. A wide variation in technical parameters was found. Nonetheless, responses indicate that PBM provided pain relief.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomatitis / Odontólogos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomatitis / Odontólogos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel
...