Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Social Media Usage by United States Plastic Surgery Subspecialty Fellowship Programs.
Tian, William M; Sergesketter, Amanda R; Yi, Victoria N; Sizemore, J Alexander; Record, Sydney M; Zeng, Steven L; Phillips, Brett T.
Afiliación
  • Tian WM; From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
  • Sergesketter AR; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
  • Yi VN; From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
  • Sizemore JA; From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
  • Record SM; From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
  • Zeng SL; From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
  • Phillips BT; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(7): e5132, 2023 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37483893
ABSTRACT
Social media can be a powerful tool for plastic surgery training programs. Previous studies have shown the value social media may have in integrated residency program recruitment and program reputation. These findings may generalize to fellowship programs, but this space has not been comprehensively studied to date. Therefore, this study aims to characterize plastic surgery fellowship programs' social media usage and identify subsequent opportunities for program leadership to generate engagement.

Methods:

United States plastic surgery fellowship programs in four major subspecialties (hand, microsurgery, craniomaxillofacial, and aesthetic) were identified and evaluated for social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Platform-specific parameters were collected and statistically analyzed in aggregate.

Results:

There were a total of 25 Instagram accounts, four Facebook accounts, and three Twitter accounts across all investigated subspecialties. Hand surgery had the greatest social media presence on Instagram (19.5%) and Twitter (3.4%). Microsurgery had the greatest presence on Facebook (4.7%). Between 2015 and 2022, Instagram was the platform with the greatest increase in adoption by fellowship programs. Geographically, microsurgery and craniomaxillofacial accounts were primarily owned by Midwest programs (66.7%, 100%), and aesthetic primarily by programs in the South (83.3%). Number of Instagram posts and followers were not significantly correlated with hospital reputation (P = 0.12, P = 0.63).

Conclusions:

Social media is underutilized by plastic surgery fellowship programs. While Instagram metrics such as posts and followers are not correlated with hospital reputation, the skewed distributions of fellowship accounts, both geographically and across platforms, represent areas of potential growth.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Caledonia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Caledonia
...