Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of Spontaneous Resorption of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-analysis.
Zou, Tao; Liu, Xue-Yang; Wang, Ping-Chuan; Chen, Hao; Wu, Pi-Gen; Feng, Xin-Min; Sun, Hui-Hui.
Afiliación
  • Zou T; Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Clin Spine Surg ; 2023 Jul 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37559207
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to analyze the incidence of spontaneous resorption of lumbar disk herniation (LDH) after conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The resorption of intervertebral disks has been more frequently reported, but there is a lack of reference to the probability of resorption.

METHODS:

We strictly refer to the standard established in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) statement, comprehensively searched electronic databases using the terms related to the spontaneous resorption of LDH. Two reviewers independently evaluated the potential studies, extracted, and analyzed the enrolled data.

RESULTS:

Thirty-one studies with 2233 patients who received conservative treatment were included for this analysis. We found that the pooled overall incidence of disk resorption was 70.39%, 87.77% for disk sequestration, 66.91% for disk extrusion, 37.53% for disk protrusion, and 13.33% for disk bugle, respectively. The resorption incidence in of 25%≤ reduction of disk herniation (RDH) 50%, RDH≥50%, and RDH=100% were 40.19%, 43.62, and 36.89%. The resorption incidence was 66.98% in Japan, 61.66% in the United States, 83.52% in Korea, 60.68% in China, 78.30% in the UK, 56.70% in Italy, and 83.68% in Turkey, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in resorption incidence among prospective, retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (P=0.77), and there was no significant difference in evaluation method among qualitative and quantitative studies (P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The existing evidence shows that the overall resorption incidence of LDH was 70.39%, the resorption incidence of ruptured LDH is higher than that of contained LDH. There are significant differences in the resorption incidence among countries. The resorption process mainly occurred within 6 months of conservative treatment.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Clin Spine Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Clin Spine Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...