Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of different symptomatic reflux esophagitis treatments: A real-world study.
Di Mario, Francesco; Crafa, Pellegrino; Franzoni, Lorella; Tursi, Antonio; Brandimarte, Giovanni; Russo, Michele; Rodriguez-Castro, Kryssia Isabel; Franceschi, Marilisa; Bortoli, Nicola De; Savarino, Edoardo.
Afiliación
  • Di Mario F; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy.
  • Crafa P; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy.
  • Franzoni L; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy.
  • Tursi A; Gastroenterology Service, Local Health Authority of Barletta-Andria-Trani Province (ASL BAT), Andria, Italy.
  • Brandimarte G; Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Cristo Re Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Russo M; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy.
  • Rodriguez-Castro KI; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Local Social Health Unit 7 (ULSS7) Alto Vicentino, Santorso, Italy.
  • Franceschi M; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Local Social Health Unit 7 (ULSS7) Alto Vicentino, Santorso, Italy.
  • Bortoli N; Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Pisa, University of Pisa, Italy.
  • Savarino E; Division of Gastroenterology, Padova Civil Hospital, University of Padua, Italy.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 32(9): 1075-1080, 2023 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37665080
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently the reference drugs for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but symptoms often recur after their withdrawal. Moreover, whether prokinetics or barrier drugs used alongside PPIs are more effective remains under debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to GERD treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 211 grade A reflux esophagitis patients who consented to participate in this non-randomized, open-label trial. The study consisted of 6 sequentially administered medical treatments for GERD, lasting 2 months, with a 3-week washout period between each drug schedule: Group A: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast); Group B: mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, 3 times daily after a meal); Group C: prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg, 3 times daily before a meal); Group D: barrier drug (alginate 3 times daily after a meal); Group E: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, before sleep); Group F: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg before lunch and dinner). Symptoms were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and global symptomatic score (GSS), as follows: heartburn: 0-3; retrosternal chest pain: 0-3; regurgitation: 0-3. RESULTS: All but 2 treatments (groups C and D) significantly improved VAS and GSS, with group E showing the most significant GSS improvement. Group C had the highest number of dropouts due to treatment failure and reported more side effects. CONCLUSION: Using PPIs and mucosal protective drugs resulted in significant symptom alleviation. However, the administration of prokinetics caused higher dropouts due to treatment failure.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Adv Clin Exp Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Adv Clin Exp Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...