Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup comment on new ACGME requirements' impact on pediatric physician-scientists.
Moore, Daniel J; Powell, Weston; Boyer, Debra; Bline, Katherine; Harshman, Lyndsay; Nowalk, Andrew; Burns, Audrea; Orange, Jordan S.
Afiliación
  • Moore DJ; Department of Pediatrics, Ian Burr Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. daniel.moore@vumc.org.
  • Powell W; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Boyer D; Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Bline K; Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Harshman L; Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Nowalk A; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Burns A; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Orange JS; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Pediatr Res ; 95(1): 70-74, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37684431
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The ACGME recently released its recommendation for updates to the program requirements for pediatrics. These updates proposed changes to allocation of resident clinical time and a greater emphasis on individualization. The potential impact of these changes on the training of physician-scientists is discussed.

METHODS:

Discussion of the proposed changes was held within the members of the National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup, a group that represents scientists, trainees, program directors, chairs, and physician-scientist educators at nearly 30 residency programs from across the US with a focus on understanding and developing optimal approaches to physician-scientist training. Consideration was given to the both the personal and institutional impact of the proposal for physician-scientist development.

RESULTS:

Both threats and opportunities were identified. Key opportunities include the enhanced individualized training time that could be used to explore research. Threats include re-allocation of clinical training time that may strain institutions financially, expand clinical service requirements for other early career stage individuals, and alter exposure to a broad range of pediatric specialists and sub-specialists that impact career development.

CONCLUSION:

The NPSCW encourages consideration of the impact of changing program requirements on physician-scientist development to include ongoing discussion amongst mentors, programs, and trainees to understand and mitigate impact of new program requirements on the development of pediatrician-scientists.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Investigación Biomédica / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Investigación Biomédica / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...