Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing clinical nutrition research: the role of adaptive and pragmatic trials.
Orsso, Camila E; Ford, Katherine L; Kiss, Nicole; Trujillo, Elaine B; Spees, Colleen K; Hamilton-Reeves, Jill M; Prado, Carla M.
Afiliación
  • Orsso CE; Human Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Ford KL; Human Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Kiss N; Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Trujillo EB; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Spees CK; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Hamilton-Reeves JM; Divison of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Prado CM; Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 77(12): 1130-1142, 2023 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37715007
Evidence-based nutritional recommendations address the health impact of suboptimal nutritional status. Efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have traditionally been the preferred method for determining the effects of nutritional interventions on health outcomes. Nevertheless, obtaining a holistic understanding of intervention efficacy and effectiveness in real-world settings is stymied by inherent constraints of efficacy RCTs. These limitations are further compounded by the complexity of nutritional interventions and the intricacies of the clinical context. Herein, we explore the advantages and limitations of alternative study designs (e.g., adaptive and pragmatic trials), which can be incorporated into RCTs to optimize the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in clinical nutrition research. Efficacy RCTs often lack external validity due to their fixed design and restrictive eligibility criteria, leading to efficacy-effectiveness and evidence-practice gaps. Adaptive trials improve the evaluation of nutritional intervention efficacy through planned study modifications, such as recalculating sample sizes or discontinuing a study arm. Pragmatic trials are embedded within clinical practice or conducted in settings that resemble standard of care, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of intervention effectiveness. Pragmatic trials often rely on patient-oriented primary outcomes, acquire outcome data from electronic health records, and employ broader eligibility criteria. Consequently, adaptive and pragmatic trials facilitate the prompt implementation of evidence-based nutritional recommendations into clinical practice. Recognizing the limitations of efficacy RCTs and the potential advantages of alternative trial designs is essential for bridging efficacy-effectiveness and evidence-practice gaps. Ultimately, this awareness will lead to a greater number of patients benefiting from evidence-based nutritional recommendations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Estado Nutricional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Estado Nutricional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...