Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gans, Emma A; van Mun, Liza A M; de Groot, Janke F; van Munster, Barbara C; Rake, Ester A; van Weert, Julia C M; Festen, Suzanne; van den Bos, Frederiek.
Afiliación
  • Gans EA; University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.a.gans@umcg.nl.
  • van Mun LAM; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • de Groot JF; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van Munster BC; University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Rake EA; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van Weert JCM; Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Festen S; University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • van den Bos F; Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Patient Educ Couns ; 116: 107981, 2023 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716242
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Decision Aids (DAs) compared to usual care or alternative interventions for older patients facing treatment, screening, or care decisions.

METHODS:

A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies included patients ≥ 65 years or reported a mean of ≥ 70 years. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice made and decision making process, user experience and ways in which DAs were tailored to older patients. Meta-analysis was conducted, if possible, or outcomes were synthesized descriptively.

RESULTS:

Overall, 15 studies were included. Using DAs were effective in increasing knowledge (SMD 0.90; 95% CI [0.48, 1.32]), decreasing decisional conflict (SMD -0.15; 95% CI [-0.29, -0.01]), improving patient-provider communication (RR 1.67; 95% CI [1.21, 2.29]), and preparing patients to make an individualized decision (MD 35.7%; 95% CI [26.8, 44.6]). Nine studies provided details on how the DA was tailored to older patients.

CONCLUSION:

This review shows a number of favourable results for the effectiveness of DAs in decision making with older patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Current DAs can be used to support shared decision making with older patients when faced with treatment, screening or care decisions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_enfermedades_transmissibles Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_enfermedades_transmissibles Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...