A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Vascular Resection.

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis examines the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with vascular resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic literature search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted, identifying five comparative retrospective cohort studies published from 2015 to 2021, with a total of 1,417 patients (180 in the vascular resection (VR) group and 1,237 in the control (no VR) group). The meta-analysis found that 30-day morbidity rates, as classified by Clavien-Dindo classification > 3, were higher in the VR group compared to the no VR group (46% versus 25%, odds ratio (OR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-8.69, p=0.44). Local recurrence rates during the follow-up period were similar between the two groups (30% versus 30%, OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.50-4.25, p=0.49). However, distant recurrence was more frequent in the VR group (32% versus 8.5%, OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.05-6.13, p=0.04). In conclusion, although oncovascular procedures are feasible for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes appear to be worse when compared to procedures that do not involve vessel resections.