Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: An Analysis from the FORECAST Trial.
Light, Alexander; Kanthabalan, Abi; Otieno, Marjorie; Pavlou, Menelaos; Omar, Rumana; Adeleke, Sola; Giganti, Francesco; Brew-Graves, Chris; Williams, Norman R; Emara, Amr; Haroon, Athar; Latifoltojar, Arash; Sidhu, Harbir; Freeman, Alex; Orczyk, Clement; Nikapota, Ashok; Dudderidge, Tim; Hindley, Richard G; Virdi, Jaspal; Arya, Manit; Payne, Heather; Mitra, Anita V; Bomanji, Jamshed; Winkler, Mathias; Horan, Gail; Moore, Caroline M; Emberton, Mark; Punwani, Shonit; Ahmed, Hashim U; Shah, Taimur T.
Afiliación
  • Light A; Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Kanthabalan A; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Otieno M; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Pavlou M; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Omar R; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Adeleke S; Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Giganti F; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Brew-Graves C; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Williams NR; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Emara A; Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.
  • Haroon A; Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Latifoltojar A; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
  • Sidhu H; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Freeman A; Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Orczyk C; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Nikapota A; Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Dudderidge T; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Hindley RG; Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.
  • Virdi J; Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.
  • Arya M; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Payne H; Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Mitra AV; Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Bomanji J; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Winkler M; Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Horan G; Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, UK.
  • Moore CM; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Emberton M; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Punwani S; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Ahmed HU; Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Shah TT; Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: t.shah@i
Eur Urol ; 85(1): 35-46, 2024 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778954
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate MRI and MRI-targeted biopsies for detecting intraprostatic cancer recurrence and planning for salvage focal ablation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

FOcal RECurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment (FORECAST; NCT01883128) was a prospective cohort diagnostic study that recruited 181 patients with suspected radiorecurrence at six UK centres (2014 to 2018); 144 were included here. INTERVENTION All patients underwent MRI with 5 mm transperineal template mapping biopsies; 84 had additional MRI-targeted biopsies. MRI scans with Likert scores of 3 to 5 were deemed suspicious. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

First, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI was calculated. Second, the pathological characteristics of MRI-detected and MRI-undetected tumours were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test for trend. Third, four biopsy strategies involving an MRI-targeted biopsy alone and with systematic biopsies of one to two other quadrants were studied. Fisher's exact test was used to compare MRI-targeted biopsy alone with the best other strategy for the number of patients with missed cancer and the number of patients with cancer harbouring additional tumours in unsampled quadrants. Analyses focused primarily on detecting cancer of any grade or length. Last, eligibility for focal therapy was evaluated for men with localised (≤T3bN0M0) radiorecurrent disease. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

Of 144 patients, 111 (77%) had cancer detected on biopsy. MRI sensitivity and specificity at the patient level were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 0.99) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.35), respectively. At the prostate quadrant level, 258/576 (45%) quadrants had cancer detected on biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.66 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.73) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.62), respectively. At the quadrant level, compared with MRI-undetected tumours, MRI-detected tumours had longer maximum cancer core length (median difference 3 mm [7 vs 4 mm]; 95% CI 1 to 4 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher grade group (p = 0.002). Of the 84 men who also underwent an MRI-targeted biopsy, 73 (87%) had recurrent cancer diagnosed. Performing an MRI-targeted biopsy alone missed cancer in 5/73 patients (7%; 95% CI 3 to 15%); with additional systematic sampling of the other ipsilateral and contralateral posterior quadrants (strategy 4), 2/73 patients (3%; 95% CI 0 to 10%) would have had cancer missed (difference 4%; 95% CI -3 to 11%, p = 0.4). If an MRI-targeted biopsy alone was performed, 43/73 (59%; 95% CI 47 to 69%) patients with cancer would have harboured undetected additional tumours in unsampled quadrants. This reduced but only to 7/73 patients (10%; 95% CI 4 to 19%) with strategy 4 (difference 49%; 95% CI 36 to 62%, p < 0.0001). Of 73 patients, 43 (59%; 95% CI 47 to 69%) had localised radiorecurrent cancer suitable for a form of focal ablation.

CONCLUSIONS:

For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy, MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy, with or without perilesional sampling, will diagnose cancer in the majority where present. MRI-undetected cancers, defined as Likert scores of 1 to 2, were found to be smaller and of lower grade. However, if salvage focal ablation is planned, an MRI-targeted biopsy alone is insufficient for prostate mapping; approximately three of five patients with recurrent cancer found on an MRI-targeted biopsy alone harboured further tumours in unsampled quadrants. Systematic sampling of the whole gland should be considered in addition to an MRI-targeted biopsy to capture both MRI-detected and MRI-undetected disease. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

After radiotherapy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accurate for detecting recurrent prostate cancer, with missed cancer being smaller and of lower grade. Targeting a biopsy to suspicious areas on MRI results in a diagnosis of cancer in most patients. However, for every five men who have recurrent cancer, this targeted approach would miss cancers elsewhere in the prostate in three of these men. If further focal treatment of the prostate is planned, random biopsies covering the whole prostate in addition to targeted biopsies should be considered so that tumours are not missed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...