Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing two different orthogeriatric models of care for hip fracture patients: an observational prospective cross-sectional study.
Solberg, Lene Bergendal; Vesterhus, Elise Berg; Hestnes, Ingvild; Ahmed, Marc Vali; Ommundsen, Nina; Westberg, Marianne; Frihagen, Frede.
Afiliación
  • Solberg LB; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway l.b.solberg@gmail.com.
  • Vesterhus EB; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Hestnes I; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ahmed MV; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ommundsen N; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Westberg M; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Frihagen F; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
BMJ Open Qual ; 12(Suppl 2)2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783524
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patients with hip fractures are almost always operated with quite extensive surgery and are often frail with a high risk of complications, increased dependency, and death. Orthogeriatric interdisciplinary care has shown better results compared with orthopaedic care alone. The best way of delivering orthogeriatric care, however, is still largely unknown. It is believed that a high degree of integration and shared care is better than on-demand consultative services. We aimed to evaluate two different orthogeriatric models for patients with hip fracture.

METHODS:

A prospective hip fracture quality database was used to evaluate two coexisting models of care from 2019 to 2021 in our hospital. An 'integrated care model' (ICM) was compared with a 'geriatric consult service' (GCS).

RESULTS:

516 patients were available for analysis, 360 from ICM and 156 from GCS. Mean age was 84 years. There were 370 (72%) women. American Society of Anesthesiologists class and prefracture cognitive impairment was similar between the groups. There were more patients with femoral neck fractures in the ICM group, and more patients were living independently prefracture. A logistic regression adjusting for the variables above showed that more patients in the ICM group were given a nerve block preoperatively (OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.31 to 2.97); p<0.01), had their urinary catheter removed the first day after surgery (OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.89); p<0.01), were mobilised to standing or seated in a chair beside the bed the first day after surgery (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.30); p=0.033) and more ICM patients were considered for treatment against osteoporosis (OR 8.58 (95% CI 4.03 to 18.28); p<0.001). There were no significant differences in time to surgery, length of stay, discharge destination or mortality.

CONCLUSION:

The ICM group performed equally good or better on all quality indicators than the GCS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Fracturas del Cuello Femoral / Fracturas de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Fracturas del Cuello Femoral / Fracturas de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega
...