Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The inclusion of adults with intellectual disabilities in health research - challenges, barriers and opportunities: a mixed-method study among stakeholders in England.
Bishop, R; Laugharne, R; Shaw, N; Russell, A M; Goodley, D; Banerjee, S; Clack, E; Shankar, R.
Afiliación
  • Bishop R; Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK.
  • Laugharne R; Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK.
  • Shaw N; School of Medicine, Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula, Truro, UK.
  • Russell AM; NIHR Clinical Research Network South-West Peninsula, Exeter, UK.
  • Goodley D; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Banerjee S; School of Education, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Clack E; Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
  • Shankar R; The Cornwall Intellectual Disability and Autism Support Team (7 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic spectrum conditions), Truro, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 68(2): 140-149, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815212
BACKGROUND: The study aims to understand system barriers to research participation for people with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach examined the inclusivity of people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) in a random sample of National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) studies conducted in 2019-2020. An online questionnaire (stage 1) was sent to the selected studies lead investigators. An expert by experience panel of 25 people with intellectual disabilities (IDs, stage 2), discussed the stage 1 feedback. Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data was conducted. RESULTS: Of 180 studies reviewed, 131 studies (78%) excluded people with IDs. Of these, 45 (34.3%) study researchers provided feedback. Seven (20%) of the 34 studies which included people with IDs gave feedback. Of all respondents over half felt their study had some relevance to people with IDs. A minority (7.6%) stated their study had no relevance. For a quarter of respondents (23.5%), resource issues were a challenge. Qualitative analysis of both stages produced four overarching themes of Research design and delivery, Informed consent, Resource allocation, and Knowledge and skills. CONCLUSION: Health research continues to exclude people with IDs. Researchers and experts by experience identified non-accessible research design, lack of confidence with capacity and consent processes, limited resources such as time and a need for training as barriers. Ethics committees appear reluctant to include people with cognitive deficits to 'protect' them. People with IDs want to be included in research, not only as participants but also through coproduction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Discapacidad Intelectual Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Intellect Disabil Res Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS MENTAIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Discapacidad Intelectual Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Intellect Disabil Res Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS MENTAIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...