Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individual placement and support focusing on employment and education for young people at clinical high risk of psychosis: A feasibility study.
Del Piccolo, Maria Chiara; Valmaggia, Lucia; Henderson, Claire; Spencer, Tom J; Lewis, David; Fitzell, Sharon; Edwards, Sara; Evans, Carys; Tognin, Stefania.
Afiliación
  • Del Piccolo MC; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
  • Valmaggia L; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
  • Henderson C; South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust.
  • Spencer TJ; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
  • Fitzell S; Outreach and Support in South London Service, South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust.
  • Edwards S; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
  • Evans C; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
  • Tognin S; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 47(1): 56-63, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917465
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with a focus on educational and employment goals, within a clinical service for the early detection of individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis.

METHOD:

Between June 2019 and April 2021, participants were recruited and received up to 6 (± 2) months support. Primary

outcome:

Enrolled participants, attended sessions, and disengagement rates were analyzed to assess feasibility. SECONDARY

OUTCOMES:

Enrollment in mainstream education or/and employment, hours spent working or/and studying, salary, level of functioning, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up were compared.

RESULTS:

Thirty-one participants were recruited, 13 of whom were remotely recruited after the first COVID-19 lockdown. Dropout rates were relatively low (16.1%), and 26 participants (83.9%) completed the program. Each participant received on average nine sessions (M = 9.65; SD = 4.92). Secondary

outcomes:

At follow-up, 73.1% participants were employed, working on average more hours per week, t(25) = -2.725; p = .012, and were earning significantly more money, t(25) = -3.702; p = .001, compared to baseline. Gains in educational outcomes were less clear. Global Assessment of Functioning, t = 248.50; p = .001, and Social Occupational Functioning, t(25) = -3.273; p = .003, were significantly higher at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. No differences were found in participants' self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Findings indicate that research procedures are appropriate and that IPS implementation within a CHR clinical team is feasible. Secondary outcomes also suggest that IPS may be a beneficial intervention for young people at CHR. A longer follow-up might be needed to assess its impact on educational outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatr Rehabil J Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatr Rehabil J Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...