Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Decision Regret in Patients with Same-Day Discharge Pathway After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Khanmammadova, Narmina; Shahait, Mohammed; Nguyen, Tuan Thanh; Basilius, Jacob; Ali, Sohrab Naushad; Tran, Joshua; Gevorkyan, Rafael; Fung, Catherine; Ahlering, Thomas E; Lee, David I.
Afiliación
  • Khanmammadova N; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Shahait M; Department of Surgery, Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Nguyen TT; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Basilius J; Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Ali SN; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Tran J; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Gevorkyan R; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Fung C; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Ahlering TE; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Lee DI; Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
J Endourol ; 38(1): 23-29, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937698
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

After the introduction of same-day discharge (SDD) pathways for various surgeries, these pathways have demonstrated comparable complication rates and a reduced overall cost of care. Outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is introduced in high-volume centers; however, patients' perspectives on the SDD RARP protocol are not well understood. Materials and

Methods:

A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions, including the Likert Decisional Regret Scale, was distributed to patients who underwent RARP at our center. The overall decision regret score was calculated as described in the literature. We used 15 as a cutoff point for differentiating between high- and low-regret rates. Median and interquartile range were determined for non-normally distributed variables, while mean ± standard deviation was calculated for continuous data.

Results:

Of the 72 patients who completed the questionnaire, 65.7% (n = 44) of patients felt no regret about their decision of choosing the SDD RARP protocol and 90.3% (n = 65) of men stated that they would have made the same decision. At the same time, 97.1% (n = 68) of patients would also recommend this procedure to others. The median decisional regret score of the cohort (n = 67) was 0 (0-10). Fifty-four of 67 (80.6%) patients were in the low-regret score group, while 13 (19.4%) were in the high-regret group. Patients in the high-regret group were more likely to have low household income (<$30,000 a year) and they experienced postoperative pain more frequently compared with patients in the lower regret group (7.7% vs 1.9%, p = 0.626, and 61.5% vs 38.9%, p = 0.212, respectively).

Conclusions:

Most patients expressed low regret about choosing the SDD pathway for RARP, underscoring the importance of thorough explanation of the procedure and discharge process to enhance patient experience. However, a subset of patients did express regret, possibly due to an interplay of patient- and procedure-related factors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...