Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Internal structure validity and internal consistency reliability of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire: a systematic review protocol.
Gowani, Ambreen Amir Ali; Low, Gail; Norris, Colleen; Hoben, Matthias.
Afiliación
  • Gowani AAA; Faculty of nursing, University of Alberta College of Health Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada gowani@ualberta.ca.
  • Low G; School of nursing and midwifery pakistan, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Norris C; Faculty of nursing, College of Health Sciences University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Hoben M; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open ; 13(11): e076780, 2023 11 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940148
INTRODUCTION: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is one of the most used tools to measure health-related quality of life in heart failure. Despite extensive use in research, evidence on the MLHFQ's internal structure validity remains heterogeneous and inconclusive. There are no known reviews that systematically summarise the evidence related to the MLHFQ's factor structure (internal structure validity). This gap highlights a need to critically appraise, summarise and compare the available evidence on the internal structure and internal consistency reliability (ICR) of the MLHFQ. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will adhere to the reporting guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. We will systematically search eleven electronic databases/search engines (Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Global Health, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Scopus, Journals, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Dissertation and Theses Global) for quantitative studies assessing the MLHFQ's factor structure and ICR. Two reviewers will then independently screen studies for eligibility and assess the quality of included studies using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments checklist. Throughout the review, discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or by the involvement of the third reviewer. We will analyse and present results using descriptive statistics (frequencies, proportions and ranges) and narrative synthesis. We will include all the relevant studies published within the timeframe covered by the database. We carried out the preliminary search in November 2022 except for Dissertation and Theses Global which was searched in September 2023; however, we will update the entire search right before the review completion in January 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as no primary data is being collected from individuals. We intend to share the findings of the review at international conferences and publish manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023346919.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_cobertura_universal Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Estado de Salud Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_cobertura_universal Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Estado de Salud Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...