Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding the trade-offs of national municipal solid waste estimation methods for circular economy policy.
Vines, Valerie; Pasquali, Matt; Ganguli, Swarupa; Meyer, David E.
Afiliación
  • Vines V; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Hosted By U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (5304T), Washington DC, 20460, USA.
  • Pasquali M; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Hosted By U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (5304T), Washington DC, 20460, USA.
  • Ganguli S; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (5304T), Washington DC, 20460, USA.
  • Meyer DE; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, 26 W Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA.
J Clean Prod ; 412: 1-11, 2023 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990709
ABSTRACT
Policies embracing circular economy concepts have taken hold in national legislation around the world. As the number of governments and organizations adopting circular economy policies increases, so does the need for accurate and timely measurement of material resource flows. Since many countries do not have access to centrally reported municipal solid waste (MSW) data, estimation and modeling are critical in evaluating circular economy policy effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to examine three modeling approaches estimating national MSW data in the United States, including industry-based material flow analysis, waste-extended input-output modeling, and aggregated regional waste reporting. We establish five criteria to guide the analysis through the context of policy monitoring (data quality, flow totality, update frequency, sensitivity to disruption, and product granularity) and use these criteria to analyze and score each model. We then use a literature search to identify five, internationally-implemented options for circular economy policy and determine the data and modeling components that are most helpful in evaluating policy effectiveness. Finally, we provide a crosswalk of the model scores and policy needs to inform the suitability of model selection by policy type. We found that data quality and update frequency are identified as critical components for evaluating circular economy policies within the models evaluated, and can both be fulfilled by aggregated regional waste reporting. Flow totality, sensitivity to disruption, and product granularity requirements vary by both model and policy types. While none of the evaluated models satisfy the combination of requirements for any of the five policies, industry-based material flow analysis offers flow totality for extended producer responsibility, landfill bans, and recycling rate target policies that typically require it. The waste-extended input-output model can provide disruption sensitivity and product granularity as needed for policies like minimum recycled content and market restrictions. Policy developers in areas where strong centralized data collection is not an option should design policy action(s) with modeling tradeoffs in mind, including the potential hybridization of modeling approaches that may provide the most accurate national MSW estimates.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clean Prod Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clean Prod Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...