Multicenter, prospective cohort study: immediate postoperative gains in active range of motion following robotic-assisted total knee replacement compared to a propensity-matched control using manual instrumentation.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) following total knee replacement (TKR) has been associated with patient satisfaction and knee function, and is also an early indicator of a successful procedure. Robotic-assisted TKR (raTKR) is considered to reproduce more precise resections, and, as a result, may be associated with improved early patient satisfaction compared to manual TKR (mTKR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative active ROM (aROM) between raTKR and mTKR. METHODS: A total of 216 mTKR patients were propensity-matched, in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, and BMI, to 216 raTKR cases. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative adverse events were collected. Knee flexion and extension aROM were measured preoperatively and at one- and three months after operation. RESULTS: Changes in flexion aROM were significantly greater in raTKR vs. mTKR at one- (6.9°, 95% CI 3.5, 10.4°) and three months (4.9°, 95% CI 2.1, 7.7°). Flexion aROM was greater at three postoperative months compared to preoperative aROM only in the raTKR group, and raTKR patients had higher odds of achieving ≥ 90° of flexion at one month after operation (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.16, 3.99). There were no significant differences between groups in intraoperative (P > 0.999) or postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mTKR, raTKR resulted  in less loss of aROM immediately after operation and a faster recovery of aROM within three months after operation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT# 03737149).