Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for organs at risk delineation.
Yamauchi, Ryohei; Itazawa, Tomoko; Kobayashi, Takako; Kashiyama, Shiho; Akimoto, Hiroyoshi; Mizuno, Norifumi; Kawamori, Jiro.
Afiliación
  • Yamauchi R; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: yamauchi.ryouhei@gmail.com.
  • Itazawa T; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kobayashi T; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kashiyama S; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
  • Akimoto H; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Mizuno N; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kawamori J; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Med Dosim ; 2023 Dec 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061916
ABSTRACT
Manual delineation of organs at risk and clinical target volumes is essential in radiotherapy planning. Atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) algorithms have become available and been shown to provide accurate contouring for various anatomical sites. Recently, deep learning auto-segmentation (DL-AS) algorithms have emerged as the state-of-the-art in medical image segmentation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of auto-segmentation on the clinical workflow for contouring different anatomical sites of cancer, such as head and neck (H&N), breast, abdominal region, and prostate. Patients with H&N, breast, abdominal, and prostate cancer (n = 30 each) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-seven different organs at four sites were evaluated. RayStation was used to apply the ABAS. Siemens AI-Rad Companion Organs RT was used to apply the DL-AS. Evaluations were performed with similarity indices using geometric methods, time-evaluation, and qualitative scoring visual evaluations by radiation oncologists. The DL-AS algorithm was more accurate than ABAS algorithm on geometric indices for half of the structures. The qualitative scoring results of the two algorithms were significantly different, and DL-AS was more accurate on many contours. DL-AS had 41%, 29%, 86%, and 15% shorter edit times in the HnN, breast, abdomen, and prostate groups, respectively, than ABAS. There were no correlations between the geometric indices and visual assessments. The time required to edit the contours was considerably shorter for DL-AS than for ABAS. Auto-segmentation with deep learning could be the first step for clinical workflow optimization in radiotherapy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...