Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Empowering Medical Students: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Precision Point-of-Care Echocardiography Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
Dadon, Ziv; Orlev, Amir; Butnaru, Adi; Rosenmann, David; Glikson, Michael; Gottlieb, Shmuel; Alpert, Evan Avraham.
Afiliación
  • Dadon Z; Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Orlev A; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Butnaru A; Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Rosenmann D; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Glikson M; Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Gottlieb S; Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Alpert EA; Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Int J Clin Pract ; 2023: 5225872, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38078051
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is now universal among nonexperts. Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently employed by nonexperts in various imaging modalities to assist in diagnosis and decision making.

Aim:

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS, operated by medical students with the assistance of an AI-based tool for assessing the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients admitted to a cardiology department.

Methods:

Eight students underwent a 6-hour didactic and hands-on training session. Participants used a hand-held ultrasound device (HUD) equipped with an AI-based tool for the automatic evaluation of LVEF. The clips were assessed for LVEF by three

methods:

visually by the students, by students + the AI-based tool, and by the cardiologists. All LVEF measurements were compared to formal echocardiography completed within 24 hours and were evaluated for LVEF using the Simpson method and eyeballing assessment by expert echocardiographers.

Results:

The study included 88 patients (aged 58.3 ± 16.3 years). The AI-based tool measurement was unsuccessful in 6 cases. Comparing LVEF reported by students' visual evaluation and students + AI vs. cardiologists revealed a correlation of 0.51 and 0.83, respectively. Comparing these three evaluation methods with the echocardiographers revealed a moderate/substantial agreement for the students + AI and cardiologists but only a fair agreement for the students' visual evaluation.

Conclusion:

Medical students' utilization of an AI-based tool with a HUD for LVEF assessment achieved a level of accuracy similar to that of cardiologists. Furthermore, the use of AI by the students achieved moderate to substantial inter-rater reliability with expert echocardiographers' evaluation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Medicina / Función Ventricular Izquierda Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Medicina / Función Ventricular Izquierda Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel
...