Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring heart failure nurse practitioner outcome measures: a scoping review.
Ryder, Mary; Mannion, Tara; Furlong, Eileen; O'Donoghue, Ethel; Travers, Bronagh; Connolly, Michael; Lucey, Niamh.
Afiliación
  • Ryder M; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Mannion T; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Furlong E; St Claires Integrated Care Centre, Dublin 11, Ireland.
  • O'Donoghue E; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Travers B; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Connolly M; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Lucey N; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 23(4): 337-347, 2024 May 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165269
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Clinical guidelines recommend people with heart failure are managed within a multidisciplinary team to receive optimal evidence-based management of the syndrome. There is increasing evidence that Nurse Practitioners (NP) in heart failure demonstrate positive patient outcomes. However, their roles as key stakeholders in a multidisciplinary heart failure team are not clearly defined. The aim of the review was to explore the literature related to NP-sensitive outcomes in heart failure. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

A scoping review was conducted according to accepted guidelines using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework for conducting a scoping review, to identify the literature that related to NP-sensitive outcomes in heart failure management. Sixteen texts were selected for data extraction and analysis. The most common outcome measures reported were readmission rates, self-care measurement scales, functional status scores, quality of life measurements, and medication optimization outcomes. No two studies collected or reported on the same outcome measurements.

CONCLUSION:

This review highlights that the reporting of heart failure (HF) NP outcome indicators was inconsistent and disparate across the literature. The outcome measures reported were not exclusive to NP interventions. Nurse Practitioner roles are not clearly defined, and resulting outcomes from care are difficult to characterize. Standardized NP-specific outcome measures would serve to highlight the effectiveness of the role in a multidisciplinary HF team.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Enfermeras Practicantes Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Enfermeras Practicantes Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda
...