Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The response of the Military Health System (MHS) to the COVID-19 pandemic: a summary of findings from MHS reviews.
Pomer, Alysa; Munigala, Satish; Coles, Christian L; Mitro, Jessica Pope; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Weissman, Joel S; Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez.
Afiliación
  • Pomer A; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, United States of America. apomer1@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Munigala S; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
  • Coles CL; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
  • Mitro JP; Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
  • Schoenfeld AJ; Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America.
  • Weissman JS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Koehlmoos TP; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, United States of America.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 5, 2024 Jan 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191494
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused major disruptions to the US Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we evaluated the MHS response to the pandemic to understand the impact of the pandemic response in a large, national, integrated healthcare system providing care for ~ 9 million beneficiaries.

METHODS:

We performed a narrative literature review of 16 internal Department of Defense (DoD) reports, including reviews mandated by the US Congress in response to the pandemic. We categorized the findings using the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework developed by the DoD to assess system efficiency and effectiveness.

RESULTS:

The majority of the findings were in the policy, organization, and personnel categories. Key findings showed that the MHS structure to address surge situations was beneficial during the pandemic response, and the rapid growth of telehealth created the potential impact for improved access to routine and specialized care. However, organizational transition contributed to miscommunication and uneven implementation of policies; disruptions affected clinical training, upskilling, and the supply chain; and staffing shortages contributed to burnout among healthcare workers.

CONCLUSION:

Given its highly integrated, vertical structure, the MHS was in a better position than many civilian healthcare networks to respond efficiently to the pandemic. However, similar to the US civilian sector, the MHS also experienced delays in care, staffing and materiel challenges, and a rapid switch to telehealth. Lessons regarding the importance of communication and preparation for future public health emergency responses are relevant to civilian healthcare systems responding to COVID-19 and other similar public health crises.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Militares / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Militares / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...