ACTB may serve as a predictive marker for the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with HBV-related early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma following partial hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT

Background: The lack of effective biomarkers for the treatment of postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists despite lenvatinib therapy. This study aims to identify beta-actin (ACTB) as a predictive biomarker for lenvatinib that can facilitate individualized treatment for HCC. Methods: This retrospective study included a subset of patients with HCC who underwent partial hepatectomy, with some receiving postoperative lenvatinib treatment and others not receiving lenvatinib treatment. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis of patients who underwent treatment with or without lenvatinib following HCC partial hepatectomy was performed. Immunohistochemistry was employed to determine the levels of ACTB expression in HCC samples obtained from matched patients (n=225) enrolled in this study. The X-Tile was employed to determine the optimal cut-off point of ACTB levels for predicting time to recurrence (TTR). To assess the correlation between ACTB levels and lenvatinib efficacy, a subgroup analysis of TTR was conducted. A Cox regression model with an interaction term was utilized to assess the predictive significance of the model. Subsequently, a nomogram was developed and its discriminative ability and predictive accuracy were assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. For the investigation of the ACTB expression, HCC and para-tumoral normal tissues were employed. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was utilized to validate the correlation between ACTB levels and lenvatinib responsiveness. Results: After PSM, a total of 76 patients who underwent postoperative lenvatinib treatment were included in the analysis, with a median TTR of 24.35 months. Early-stage HCC patients with lower levels of ACTB exhibited a more favorable response to lenvatinib therapy compared to those with higher levels. The reduced expression of ACTB was indicative of the benefits of lenvatinib, as opposed to higher levels {hazard ratio (HR) =0.243 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.096-0.619], P<0.001, P value for interaction =0.014}. In approximately 81.8% of cases involving HCC patients, there was an observed increase in the expression of ACTB. Multivariate analysis of the lenvatinib cohort revealed Child-Pugh [HR =5.416 (95% CI 1.390-21.104), P=0.015], Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage [HR =2.508 (95% CI 1.116-5.639), P=0.026], and ACTB [HR =5.879 (95% CI 2.424-14.259), P<0.001] score as independent factors for TTR, and all were included in the nomogram. The survival probability based on the calibration curve showed that the prediction of the nomogram was in good agreement with the actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.84). Moreover, the PDXs derived from tumors exhibiting low levels of ACTB expression demonstrated a heightened sensitivity to lenvatinib treatment. Conclusions: In patients with tumors treated with lenvatinib, low ACTB expression can predict a lower risk of recurrence. The validation of this potential biomarker in independent cohorts is necessary prior to its implementation for precision treatment stratification in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for early-stage HCC.