Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between the Medicare Advantage Quartile Adjustment System and Plan Behavior and Enrollment.
Murray, Roslyn C; Meyers, David J; Fuse Brown, Erin C; Williams, Travis C; Ryan, Andrew M.
Afiliación
  • Murray RC; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Meyers DJ; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Fuse Brown EC; Georgia State University, Atlanta.
  • Williams TC; Georgia State University, Atlanta.
  • Ryan AM; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(1): e234822, 2024 Jan 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214920
ABSTRACT
Importance Medicare Advantage (MA) has grown in popularity, but critics believe that insurers are overpaid, partially due to the quartile adjustment system that determines plan benchmarks. However, elimination of the quartile adjustments may be associated with less generous benefits and fewer plan offerings, which could slow MA enrollment growth.

Objective:

To examine whether the quartile adjustment system is associated with differences in county-level benefits, insurer offerings, and MA enrollment. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

The quartile adjustments create discontinuous jumps in county-level base payments based on historical traditional Medicare spending. Data from January 2017 to December 2021 and a regression discontinuity design were used to examine changes in insurer behavior and MA enrollment between quartiles. The analytic sample included 1557 county observations. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Study outcomes included monthly premiums, the share of plans charging premiums, primary care copayments, the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums, supplemental benefits, plan and contract availability, and MA enrollment.

Results:

Discontinuities were found in the quartile adjustments and benchmarks. A 1-percentage point (pp) increase in the quartile adjustment was associated with a $6.36 increase in monthly benchmarks (95% CI, 5.10-7.62), a $0.51 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, -0.96 to -0.07), and a 0.68 pp decrease in the share of plans charging premiums (95% CI, -1.25 to -0.10). Significant changes were not found in primary care copayments (-$0.04; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.09), the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums (-0.17 pp; 95% CI, -0.34 to 0.01), supplemental benefits (eg, preventive dental coverage; 0.17 pp; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.0), the number of plans (1.06; 95% CI, -3.44 to 5.57) or contracts (0.31; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.81), or the MA enrollment rate (0.16 pp; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.94). Conclusions and Relevance The study results suggest that MA plans are not very sensitive to modest changes in payment rates. Modifications to the quartile adjustment system may generate savings without substantially affecting MA beneficiaries.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Problema de salud: 11_governance_arrangements Asunto principal: Medicare Part C Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Health Forum Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Problema de salud: 11_governance_arrangements Asunto principal: Medicare Part C Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Health Forum Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...