Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematics and spatio-temporal evolutionary patterns of the flavopilosa group of Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae).
Antoniolli, Henrique R M; Carvalho, Tuane L; Gottschalk, Marco S; Loreto, Elgion L S; Robe, Lizandra J; Depr, Marndia.
Afiliación
  • Antoniolli HRM; Programa de Ps-Graduao em Biologia Animal; Instituto de Biocincias; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS); Porto Alegre; RS; Brazil. antoniolli.henrique@hotmail.com.
  • Carvalho TL; Programa de Ps-Graduao em Biodiversidade Animal; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM); Santa Maria; RS; Brazil. tuanelfc@gmail.com.
  • Gottschalk MS; Programa de Ps-Graduao em Gentica e Biologia Molecular; Instituto de Biocincias; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS); Porto Alegre; RS; Brazil. gotts007@yahoo.com.
  • Loreto ELS; Departamento de Ecologia; Zoologia e Gentica; Instituto de Biologia; Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel); Pelotas; RS; Brazil. elgion@base.ufsm.br.
  • Robe LJ; Programa de Ps-Graduao em Biodiversidade Animal; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM); Santa Maria; RS; Brazil. lizbiogen@gmail.com.
  • Depr M; Programa de Ps-Graduao em Gentica e Biologia Molecular; Instituto de Biocincias; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS); Porto Alegre; RS; Brazil. marindiadepra@gmail.com.
Zootaxa ; 5399(1): 1-18, 2024 Jan 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38221179
ABSTRACT
The Drosophila flavopilosa group comprises morphologically cryptic species that are ecologically restricted to feeding, breeding and ovipositing on flowers of Cestrum and Sessea (Solanaceae). Previous studies confirmed the monophyly of the group and the success of DNA barcoding in identifying a subset of its species, but several others remain yet to be evaluated. Furthemore, the taxonomy of the group remains incomplete, with only nine of the 17 species assigned to subgroups. Here, we accessed the phylogenetic relationships and spatio-temporal evolutionary patterns of the flavopilosa group based on a mitochondrial and two nuclear genes, providing the first molecular support to the subdivision of the group and suggesting a new taxonomic scheme for its species. Barcoding proved to be an effective tool, as all species were reciprocally monophyletic and different analyses of species delimitation yielded congruent results. The close relationship of D. flavopilosa with D. cestri and D. cordeiroi was strongly supported, suggesting that the latter should be placed in the flavopilosa subgroup together with the first. Furthermore, D. mariaehelenae was positioned as sister to D. incompta, supporting its inclusion in the nesiota subgroup. Despite new taxonomic assignments, the synapomorphic status of the diagnostic characters proposed for both subgroups was supported. Based on them, each of the remaining species were placed into one of both subgroups. Divergence time estimates suggest that their diversification coincided with the divergence of Sessea and Cestrum, providing an interesting case of coevolution.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Drosophila / Fitomejoramiento Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Zootaxa Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Drosophila / Fitomejoramiento Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Zootaxa Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...