Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in emergency medicine practice: 2022 updates.
Goldsmith, Andrew J; Brown, Joseph; Duggan, Nicole M; Finkelberg, Tomer; Jowkar, Nick; Stegeman, Joseph; Riscinti, Matthew; Nagdev, Arun; Amini, Richard.
Afiliación
  • Goldsmith AJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ajgoldsmith@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Brown J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: joseph.r.brown@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Duggan NM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: nmduggan@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Finkelberg T; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Jowkar N; University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA. Electronic address: nick.jowkar@med.uvm.edu.
  • Stegeman J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Riscinti M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA. Electronic address: matthew.riscinti@denverem.org.
  • Nagdev A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Amini R; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Am J Emerg Med ; 78: 112-119, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244244
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In the Emergency Department (ED), ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a cornerstone of multimodal pain regimens. We investigated current national practices of UGNBs across academic medical center EDs, and how these trends have changed over time.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of academic EDs with ultrasound fellowships across the United States. Twenty-item questionnaires exploring UGNB practice patterns, training, and complications were distributed between November 2021-June 2022. Data was manually curated, and descriptive statistics were performed. The survey results were then compared to results from Amini et al. 2016 UGNB survey to identify trends.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 80.5% (87 of 108 programs). One hundred percent of responding programs perform UGNB at their institutions, with 29% (95% confidence interval (CI), 20%-39%) performing at least 5 blocks monthly. Forearm UGNB are most commonly performed (96% of programs (95% CI, 93%-100%)). Pain control for fractures is the most common indication (84%; 95% CI, 76%-91%). Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 77%-92%) of programs report at least 80% of UGNB performed are effective. Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 66%-85%) of programs have had no reported complications from UGNB performed by emergency providers at their institution. The remaining 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) report an average of 1 complication annually.

CONCLUSIONS:

All programs participating in our study report performing UGNB in their ED, which is a 16% increase over the last 5 years. UGNB's are currently performed safely and effectively in the ED, however practice improvements can still be made. Creating multi-disciplinary committees at local and national levels can standardize guidelines and practice policies to optimize patient safety and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina de Emergencia / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Emerg Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina de Emergencia / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Emerg Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...