Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parallax and Distortion in Fluoroscopy Units.
Brown, Joseph R; Hill, Zachary P; Groeschl, Ross; Mendicino, Robert W; Steginsky, Brian; Houser, Joshua.
Afiliación
  • Brown JR; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Hill ZP; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Groeschl R; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Mendicino RW; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Steginsky B; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Houser J; OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Foot Ankle Spec ; : 19386400231226028, 2024 Jan 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282326
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Parallax is an imaging phenomenon where an object appears to be at different positions when viewed from different angles. Distortion can occur secondary to internal fluoroscopic, or external environmental, factors. Fluoroscopy is a vital tool to assist surgeons intraoperatively. However, parallax and distortion can lead to inaccuracy, potentially leading to incorrect surgical decisions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of parallax/distortion in large fluoroscopy units at a level-1 trauma center.

METHODS:

Two types of C-arm models were evaluated, including (1) round image intensifiers, and (2) flat plate detectors (FPD). A square plexiglass grid with embedded wire at ½-in intervals was created, with a round metal washer secured centrally. The grid was placed 16 in from the image intensifier. A metal ball bearing (BB) was secured to the center of the x-ray tube. Fluoroscopic images were obtained until the BB and washer were "center-center." A straight blade served as a fiducial marker to ensure there was no off-axis angulation. Standard anterior-posterior and lateral views were obtained. External factors were considered, tested, and limited. Images were printed and the patterns of parallax/distortion were identified.

RESULTS:

All 11/11 (100%) of fluoroscopy units had some degree of parallax and/or distortion. We noted 3 different patterns, including sigmoidal, converging, and diverging. The FPD units had less apparent distortion overall; however, two-thirds (66%) were off-axis in the x- and y-axes in relation to the fiducial marker.

CONCLUSION:

All fluoroscopy units had varying degrees and patterns of parallax/distortion. We noted less overall distortion in FPDs. However, some of these units may produce images that are off-axis. This research has important implications for improving the accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy. Musculoskeletal surgeons should understand the limitations of fluoroscopy and how to combat parallax distortion to improve surgical outcomes and reduce patient morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Spec Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA / PODIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Spec Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA / PODIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...